OUR OFFICERS OF THE JUSTICE SYSTEM -- WHERE ARE THEY ON THIS ONE?
There is the matter of the law firms failing to assist. Many lawyers who were informed apparently had their brains stunned of the facts of what is going on. They did nothing AND wanted to do nothing. Even feminists in charge of discrimination to women groups, turned their back on this issue. Why? Likely, they did not want to commit suicide by challenging the medical pros. Maybe some were NOT mothers, and felt careers were more important and equality of pay. But not mother-hood, an unpaid position in our society, unless of course, one is a mother on welfare benefits, and the more children she has, the better the security.
I say, those that stepped back, rather then forward, had no time, ought to be identified, firm by firm, as well. One lawyer, in Fort St. John, BC, Canada, would not allow for a witness, a reporter, to be present in what he was going to advise, charging about $500 for an unwritten opinion how to deal with this issue. The lawyer cancelled the meeting, rather then to allow a witness to any options how to appeal to the Courts, if anything could be done.
They just did not want, it appears, to deal with professionals, on general medical practice and policies not there, in reality, to protect the public. They only wanted civil means for immediate physical damages, not to put medical executives in jail. After all, the lawyers would be dealing with nice ladies and gentlemen, respected by all of society. Just like nice people were involved in the cover-up of contaminated and untested blood used by the Red Cross. NO criminal prosecution, as to the pain and short-changed life-length of contaminated blood victims. But some Federal financial compensation was paid to the victims or their families, after a long lengthy struggle for justice.
The law firms gave no hope to change the medical practices in favor of a Medical Bill of Rights that this would NOT happen again, internal debates, that should have been made public, 200 years ago. But for some reasons, today, is the common practice of hasty clamping and the use of drugs. Both, now really out of hand.
The medical associations had 200 years of practice of stressing babies' tolerances to maximum and saying nothing of the babies that died. They were aware of the possibilities of the death of babies by hasty clamping. Yet, NO investigation if the death of child followed the care of a government approved and "licensed" medical person or persons. The license to practice was their ticket out of jail or to escape individual accountability for financial contribution to their victims and not just medical malpractice insurance picking up the tab. Would medical malpractice not want to go after individual's for criminal medical malpractice? I think so, just like car insurance companies go after criminal driving charges and seek damages from the individual, for recovery they paid to their victims.
But, the justice system, and the political system have failed to investigate the possibility of organized medical malpractice. In doing so, those involved likely put aside Rule of Law. Such rule of law, internationally, does not allow any individual to be excused of criminal liability and consequences.