This report by Dr. T. Peltonen, indicates, in my opinion, that if
a mother requested NO clamping or cutting of her infant's umbilical life-line, it can be done. So
Lotus is a legal right of the legal guardian, the mother, to protect even a c-section baby, full term
or premature to be able to have all of its cord stem cells in the
baby's body.
It is an interesting fact, that the videos of such truth of science are not
available. I believe this is on a world wide scale. UNESCO AND WHO DID
NOT HAVE
SUCH DOCUMENTATION OF KEEPING THE BABY IN TACT, A SEALED UNIT, EVEN DURING A SECTION.
Dr. Peltonen's article is proof, in my opinion, that "ALL" BABIES
CAN HAVE NO CLAMPING, OR CUTTING EVER. It will be up to the Courts to protect "all"
babies not to be denied 20 to 50 percent total blood volume, is the case in most situation where medical
persons, including 9-1-1 medics are being trained to
clamp a functioning and pulsating cord.
It is the opinion of the author, Donna Young, Protect Babies, Box 504
Dawson Creek, BC V1G 4H4 Canada, that ICC and 30 second clamping, or anything
less the full delayed clamping, is criminal assault and deprivation of human rights to the
newborn citizen. No person, regardless of age, ought to be so violated of
human rights.
The clamp is cruel and unusual punishment on the child, in most instances. The
clamp is depriving the baby of is need hormones, and enzymes and other
benefits and nutrients of the components of blood. White cells to fight infection, platelets to clot
the blood, cord stem cells, red stem cells, plasma, to name a few.
The baby's denied and deprived blood then finds its way into research, with or without the
parent's awareness.
What person, including the parent have a right to deprive their baby, even
of a drop of blood? What stranger has the right to intend to do so either? From:
www.123babybirth.com
contact:
C-Section Babies no clamping
T. Peltonen
