This site deals with assault on infants for Circumcision, so why not assault on babies deprived of their
cord blood, at birth, by hasty an
unnecesary stopping of both oxygen and blood by the cord to the baby???
CRIMINAL CODE OF CANADA:
Canadian Criminal Codes: #45, #221, 341, 430:
Section 45. Every one is protected from criminal responsibility for performing
a surgical operation on any person for the benefit of that
person if (a) the operation is performed with reasonable care and skill; and (b) it is reasonable
to perform the operation, having regard to
the state of health of the person at the time the operation is performed and to all the circumstances
of the case. R.S., c. C-34, s. 45.
Section 221, "Every one who by criminal negligence causes bodily harm to another
person is guilty of an indictable offense and liable to
imprisonment for a term not exceeding ten years, R.S., C.C-34, s.204.
Section 341 Fraudulent concealment 341. Every one who, for a fraudulent purpose, takes,
obtains, removes or conceals anything is
guilty of an indictable offense and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years. R.S.,
c. C-34, s. 301.
Section 430(5.1) Offense (5.1) Every one who willfully does an act or willfully
omits to do an act that it is his duty to do, if that act or
omission is likely to constitute mischief causing actual danger to life, or to constitute mischief in
relation to property or data, (a) is guilty of
an indictable offense and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years; or (b) is guilty
of an offense punishable on summary
conviction.
(Comments of author: Battery and Assault and Criminal Violations to the
infant as per Criminal medical malpractice.
Section #45: I see no benefit to the mother and/or infant when
doctors or other medical persons had intentions to do immediate
umbilical cord clamping on the infant. In most instances this hasty, early, and in most instances,
unnecessary clamping has been done
without "informed" knowledge that NO clamping is the right of the mother to know about and
request. And if not this method of umbilical
cord care, then the ethical and moral traditional way of at least waiting for the completion of the
child's birth. This means the placenta is
expelled.
This is the child's own magical organ and DNA will prove that. This organ
contains the child's own blood, and again DNA will prove
that. The property contained in the placenta and the umbilical cord belong to the infant, and
to none other. By waiting for the placenta to
be expelled, the infant is assured that he/she gets her own blood. But that is only assured as
long as the cord is not clamped off,
squeezed off by hand or has any other interference during the birth, such as the cord being compressed
during the birth.
By waiting for the placenta to be expelled and the cord to then be white (no
blood in it) and limp (no pulsation in the cord), it is then
safe for the child to have its umbilical cord clamped and cut or left alone, for as long as the parents
wish the child to remain with its
placenta and cord. No clamping or cutting is historical and traditional, both allowing those with
a belief of spiritual blessing to the child ,
and to deal with the umbilical cord after the placenta is expelled.
This assures full blood transfusion from placenta and cord to the child, as
long as no one pulls on the infant's umbilical cord while the
placenta is still attached inside the mother's womb, causing an inversion of her womb, and harm to the
mother to have surgery to repair
her womb. Waiting until all pulsation ceases in the umbilical cord assures the infant of all its
blood containing hormones and enzymes,
assuring also the infant has the proper red cells to carry oxygen rich in iron to all cells, and white
cells to fight infections, and plasma and
platelets to clot the blood.
With intentional immediate cord clamping which is an unnecessary operation done
only for a busy institutional time schedule, in most
cases, of a busy or indifferent medical person, this amputation on a functioning organ is wrongfully
imposed on the infant before he/she is
breathing" It lacks common sense.
That is like saying breath or else 'kid." There is not going back. Then there are delays to assist the child by artificial means of giving
oxygen and blood if the child is to survive, and if that is done to the child, the child is revived,
the child will always be a
compromised/impaired child. The degree of harm will be like Russian Roulette and to the degree
life-supports were withheld from the
child.
The tragedy of the immediate cord and 30 second clamping is that the deprived
blood is not measured out for the volume content
deprived the child, and the value of the nutrients in the blood, in the mother and father's presence,
or with their consent that their deprived
child will have its blood sent to private and public cord blood banks.
Ethics committee policies at each hospital are available to find out that once
the infant's blood was deprived it, then the doctor can
leave it for discard, and the hospital can do whatever they want with the blood by doing as they please. This discarding in the manner
they deem fit, per child, not require the parent's awareness or consent of what is done with the blood.
Most ethics committees are not well educated on such matters of methods of umbilical
cord management and they are indifferent to
what practice their doctors do, early or full delayed cord clamping. But they do allow for their
own control of the blood and prospects of
value of the placenta to be in their control.
Therefore, any income or benefit to the hospital from the collection of the
child's blood, with a tad of the blood needed for typing of the
child's blood and iron content, can fetch off the organ and blood exchange notices on their bulletin
whatever money the hospital and/or
doctor by private and separate billings can get for the placenta and the blood, is theres to keep. Again,
no information of what the realize
from depriving the baby of its blood is ever told the parents, nor how much blood yet remained in the
placenta and cord.
The placenta is valuable in cosmetics to various drug companies. The blood
contains hormones, enzymes, white cells, red cells,
platelets, and plasma that all can be separated. These nutrients each have a dollar value
to the use of them, taken without compensation
to the infant and without the infant's consent or means to protect itself, which I call a technical
theft of properties from the child.
All of the above means of discarding the blood and placenta have records that
can be investigated by the police and that they are NOT
doing this type of investigation can only mean control of the government of what situations will be
investigated by the police, and which will
NOT.
That this matter is not being fully investigated means that the government
has knowledge of misuse of the institutional care facilities
where babies are born, and in the training of the medical staff that are accommodating the government
approved medical policies, which
have also governed the education of pre-natal classes.
All the education of the mothers by the control of the government and their
agents have saw to it that the mother is not informed of the
risks of drugs taken during her labor as well as the infant's circulation system to inform her of the
value of complete transfusion to the
infant by its own organs, the placenta and cord, and the infant's own heart, pumping the blood
from the its own organ, the placenta. And
that the facts of all of this could be witnessed in a c-section.
Here the infant's organs the placenta and cord can be removed complete with
the child, all intact, and then the visual observance of
the placenta going down in weight and in volume and size can be witnessed and the infant's weight increases. The volume of transfer of
blood to the needs to the infant are about 20 to 50 percent total blood volume, which can be about 100
to 160 cc's, the latter being 5.633
ounces of blood.
To put that in a visual image, imagine a 9 pound baby that should have, ideally,
10 ounces of blood inside its body after the pulsation
of the cord has ceased, and the baby's cord was clamped immediately, it was then likely deprived of
over half its total blood volume.
Such a child this happened to is the case-law, the Chow case dealt with in a
civil matter, when it should have been a criminal matter as
the blood went missing, left the child blind, mute, and paralyzed. The blood and its whereabouts
never dealt with at the trial, assuming it
just disappeared without a trace.
In that case, there were and 3 nurses, 3 doctors and possible the person/s
involved in collect body waste organs and blood involved
as to what happened to the placenta, after it was expelled. And where did placenta and blood go
to. Was the blood drained in 7
minutes, as the obstetrician, Dr. Wong dealt with the delivery of the placenta, as a newly trained doctor
tried to revive a baby deprived of
its blood, but he was only giving the infant 100 percent oxygen, that brought the blood to the surface
of the child's skin, which it would then
disappear to essential organs, as to insufficient blood volume inside the baby.
The baby remained stable once they gave it artificial blood, Ringer's lactate,
but they did not transfuse the child's healthy Oriental blood
into its body. I wonder where the blood went, that this did not happen? I suspect, and a proper
investigation in an prompt timely manner,
most likely would have revealed it went to the public blood bank in Ontario, which was one of
the first run by Universities in experiments
on cord stem cells, and there may be other off-campus research that do not have regulations as to receivership
of organs and blood to
their off-campus research.
As for the fee for service for taking blood samples, there are blood codes and
sample codes that may realize to the doctor or nurse or
person in charge of wastes, about $250.00 per every 50 ccs sent out to cover the costs of the
sample handling.
The taking 200 ccs from a very large child 10 to 13 pounds, likely a c-section
baby followed with immediate cord clamping, means
that possibly there could be a tidy sum of $1000.00 USA to the person doing the collection. It
would not surprise me if the hospital
administration is approving of the costs the receive back to be used to raise extra money and they are
not perceiving or are being willfully
blind to the risk taking to the infant, so wrongfully deprived of its own blood to be allowed to be
received naturally, or by transfusion of its
own blood, if for some medical reason the cord had to be clamped in an untimely manner.
The ethics committees across Canada, and if in Canada, in the States, too, and
abroad may be setting of medical procedures that
are unsafe and not to the public's best interest to have infant's have their equal rights to optimal
health, by proper medical procedures that
puts no infant to risk of endangering or to be deprived of its properties of blood, all if it, as nature
intended the child to have, and none
other, without due process of law to protect the vulnerable child.
Factual Education to the Young:
Only when young teenagers begin to get educated what their doctors did to them,
that they will understand some of their problems to
learn, and even some having sexual orientation confusion and failure to develop if their hormones and
enzymes were not in proper
balance of their needs, by blood deprivation at birth, the infant's cord stem cell bloods having such
development potential in stem cells.
No where in the world have I found any resource material in the public and private
school that is teaching the infant's circulation system.
The first cord stem cell transplant from an infant's umbilical cord and placenta was done by in 1939. Who is to say the taking of the cord
stem cell blood from babies has not always been done, but only recently revealed to the public in the
late 1980's, and more so now that
the private companies want their share of the infant's blood for private enterprise.
The adult heart circulation is taught about Grade 8,but never is the infant's
circulation system taught and the magic of the placenta and
the infant's umbilical cord...its own organs..with the infant's own blood, the blood being the first
to begin the process of development, then
the heart, and then the brain takes over to control all the functions.
The cord blood is being saved to be sent to experimental labs, sometimes within
the hospital own lab technicians this was said to be
true at Alexander Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta. This has been confirmed by Gary Mar of Health and Wellness,
that they Alberta College of
Physicians & Surgeons allow this and without the informed consent of the parents of what happens
to their child's deprived blood).
Sometimes the mother gives consent to have her child's circulation stopped,
but I believe by not been given the true facts that by
stopping the infant's flow of oxygenated blood the mother has allowed between 20 to 50 percent of the
child's blood to be deprived. In
some instances, the mother and the father are paying to store the blood in a cord stem cell blood bank,
in then use if their child gets sick.
Well, that happened to a child as to the story on CBC by Peter Mansbridge, April 9, 2001.
It was interesting to note that skilled reports on CBC neglected to inform
the public how much blood the child was deprived and thus
stored, likely bringing about its leukemia condition, that it was pale and fighting for its survival,
9 months later. The CBC is controlled by
the government who have put millions of dollars into cord stem cell research requiring the infant's
of today be imposed on. It is the likely
reason both the Federal Government and the Provincial Government have played a football who is responsible
for the allowance of
criminal teaching of hasty cord clamping and the allowance for it at likely every hospital across Canada,
and if in Canada, in the States,
and if in the States, spreading on a global scale.
Failure to Investigate Criminal Practices and Concealment within the Hospital in British Columbia
and other parts of Canada:
At present, most justice officers do NOT investigate the practices of the medical
professionals, regarding unnecessary amputation of
functioning organs, performed directed and taught by the BC Justice Institute for their Ambulance Medics,
and for their counsellors, nor
the medical associations directing such high risk taking medical practices. This is when over
the years, to the present, ethical doctors
have presented over-whelming evidence of known risks of internal damage to the infant that has intentionally,
without justification,
interruption of its circulation system.
This unnecessary procedure is most frequently, in almost all instances, done
without informed rejection of that practice, and imposed
on the infant without the ability of the mother and/or the father (if present) to stop the practice
that was arbitrarily imposed on their child. In
most instances, the medical person did the unnecessary interruption of the life-support and failed to
make an accurate report that he/she
stopped the transfusion to the child and the time after birth, like 0 seconds before the infant was
even breathing, or before even 30
seconds of the birth.
The unnecessary clamping off the still functioning organ, then is NOT followed
up with how much blood remained in both the cord
(approximately 10 ccs, more or less) and how much remained in the placenta, the major organ to hold
the blood for transfusion after the
child's birth, about 20 to 50 percent of the child's total blood volume, so alleged and confirmed by
SOGC, the World Health Organizations,
and other reliable research dating back to 1950, and even to 1801.
Those areas where the justice officers failed to investigate hospital records
and records of sending out of organs and blood, and
accounts receivable for compensation for the same, are the Vancouver City Police, detachment # ,
Kamloops RCMP, and Dawson
Creek, BC., and the City of Police of Vancouver, including a female detective and a female nurse that
worked on such concerns brought
to them by those with personal experience and knowledge. The last refusal of any investigation
by such authorities was of January 2002.
The same lack of interest by law firms is on-going. It is said they take
an oath NOT to deal with frivolous matters, and so the treatment
of infant's at birth, not being an income producing person, is a frivolous creature, not worthy of equal
protection that an informed adult
would have and be able to protest violations of their rights. Not so the vulnerable child exploited
all because the mother is NOT as equally
educated as the medical person, so choosing to impose an unnecessary treatment on her baby, conceal
and/or destroy all evidence of
that unnecessary treatment, and the records that are available Apgar scores refused to be reviewed by
authorities and the Court. How
come?
It was brought to my attention that the Sergeants in charge closed the hope
of any kind of investigations, the review of Sworn
Statements and Medical Opinions, and the receiving of names of the babies whose parents had stated,
personally, to me, their child had
immediate umbilical cord clamping, before the baby was even breathing on its own.
The matter of criminal violations not being the parent's right to file the allegations,
as a mandatory need, but for a third party who can
state the awareness that A child was a victim of what may be perceived to be battery and assault. This,
then with likely latent risks of the
child having difficulties that then will not be associated with any drugs given the mother without informed
consent of the risks, and/or the
baby's umbilical cord unnecessarily clamped before the baby had the right to full blood perfusion.
Criminal Code of Canada -